Skip to content
Menu
Hello, and welcome to the March edition of the Fire on the Hill Wellbeing Digest, your monthly round-up of the latest stories in workplace mental health and employee wellbeing. This time, we look at the creeping influence of corporate jargon, a rise in young people out of work due to ill health, and new plans to broaden pay gap reporting.
Should we embrace LinkedIn speak?
A new feature from the search engine Kagi has been doing the rounds online, sparking conversation. Its ‘LinkedIn speak’ translation tool can turn a simple sentence like “I ate a sandwich for lunch” into “I leveraged strategic nutritional intake to optimise midday productivity”. The reaction has mostly been laughter, but there’s a more serious point underneath it.
This kind of language shows up in real workplaces every day. Routine tasks get wrapped in the language of strategy and impact, and while that’s sometimes genuinely useful, it can also create a quiet pressure to sound busier or more impressive than the situation warrants. Over time, that can affect how people communicate with each other and how comfortable they feel being honest about challenges or limits.
There’s some research to back this up. A Cornell University study found that people who responded most positively to corporate jargon were more likely to make poor decisions in workplace scenarios. That’s not a reason to police the language people use, but it is a good reminder that clarity tends to serve people better than polish. Saying something plainly is, in most cases, more useful and more human than dressing it up.
A broader view of pay gaps
The UK government has confirmed plans to introduce mandatory ethnicity and disability pay gap reporting for large employers, extending the existing gender pay gap framework to organizations with more than 250 employees. The timeline is still to be confirmed, but the direction of travel is clear.
On paper, this is a reporting change. In practice, it shifts the whole conversation about workplace equality.
One of the more interesting points raised by inclusion specialists is the need to look across categories. Pay outcomes can differ significantly for someone who is both disabled and from a minority ethnic background, and single-category data won’t always capture that. Without that level of detail, it’s easy to miss where disparities are actually concentrated.
There are practical challenges too. Disability in particular is widely underreported in workplaces, with many employees choosing not to disclose a condition. That means published data may only ever tell part of the story, and the responsibility falls on employers to build the kind of trust that makes disclosure feel safe in the first place.
For those looking to get ahead of this, the real opportunity is in using the process to take a proper look at how pay structures, promotion pathways and managerial decisions actually work day-to-day, and who benefits from the way they’re currently set up. Done well, that kind of transparency is useful for both organizations and employees.
Getting to young workers earlier
Analysis by The Health Foundation highlighted a significant rise in young people out of work due to ill health. In the past decade, the number of 16 to 24-year-olds not in education, employment or training who report a work-limiting condition has increased by 70%, with mental health conditions and autism accounting for the majority of cases. The UK government has responded with a package of incentives, including grants for employers who take on young people claiming universal credit and extra funding for apprenticeships.
These measures are about access, helping people get into work in the first place, and that clearly matters. But separate research from Westfield Health adds another layer to the picture, suggesting that earlier, more targeted wellbeing support in the workplace could also reduce the number of people leaving work altogether. Access and retention are both part of the same conversation.
What both findings point to is a gap between when problems appear and when support arrives. For employers, the practical question this raises isn’t a complicated one: what does it look like to act a bit earlier? In many cases, the answer is straightforward. Clear line management, timely access to support, and an open culture around health can all make a real difference. The challenge is building those habits before things reach a crisis point.
